Clinical Expert Series Cervical Cytology Screening and Evaluation
نویسنده
چکیده
For nearly 50 years, the gynecologist’s mantra has been “Yearly Pap and Pelvic.”1 Yet, it remains unclear how the practice of annual cytology became a de facto standard in the United States, because there never has been an organized, national screening program. I suspect that the test became an annual ritual for many women as a result of the widespread use of oral contraceptives in the 1960s and 1970s and the need for an annual examination to obtain prescription refills. However, now there is evidence that, for some women, annual cervical cytology screening is both not necessary and may even lead to unnecessary morbidity.2 Although the conventional Pap test is the best cancer-screening tool ever developed—it has reduced the incidence of invasive cancer of the cervix by approximately 70%—multiple publications have documented the fact that the test is insensitive and somewhat nonspecific. The reason that it is so effective in reducing cancer is a result of the natural history of the disease, rather than the ability of a single cytology sample to detect abnormalities. In addition, there are good data to support the fact that we have been far too aggressive in our management of women with minimal disease (ie, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 [CIN 1]). Several national organizations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Cancer Society, the American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, have reviewed the extensive literature that has been published about Pap tests and early lesions and have developed new guidelines for the use of Pap test screening, the evaluation of abnormal results, and management of low-grade cervical neoplasia.3–5 In this article, I will explain how I have incorporated some of the new guidelines into my practice, how the use of the human papillomavirus DNA (HPV-DNA) test can help us manage patients, and how I approach minimally abnormal cytology and biopsy (CIN1).
منابع مشابه
P-42: Prevalence of Abnormal Cervical Cytology Among Subfertile Saudi Women
Background: Since cervical cancer is reportedly the seventh most frequent cancer in women in Saudi Arabia and the eighth most frequent cancer among women aged between 15 and 44 years, we wanted to determine the prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology among subfertile women attending the reproductive medicine unit of a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: This was a retr...
متن کاملArguments in favor of HPV testing for cervical screening and post-treatment CIN2+ monitoring.
Several studies have shown that the human papilloma virus (HPV) test is a more sensitive and objective primary cervical cancer screening tool than cytology. Therefore, conversion of cytology into HPV screening (as is planned in The Netherlands and some other European regions) will result in a better protection against cervical cancer and high-grade precursor lesions. Moreover, offering self-sam...
متن کاملCervical cancer prevention Studies on outcome of cervical screening and on management of abnormal cytology findings
Background Screening by cytology has been highly effective in reducing the incidence and mortality from squamous invasive cervical cancer (ICC), but the effectiveness is less established regarding non-squamous ICC and regarding women above screening ages and below 30 years of age. Cervical cancer still occurs despite the presence of an organised screening programme. A substantial proportion of ...
متن کاملThe Japanese guideline for cervical cancer screening.
Cervical cancer is the 11th leading cause of death from cancer for females in Japan. In 2005, there were 2486 deaths from cervical cancer, accounting for 1.8% of the total number of cancer deaths in Japan. Cervical cancer screening using conventional cytology has been conducted worldwide. The guideline for cervical cancer screening was developed based on the established method. The efficacies o...
متن کاملComparison of single-, double- and triple-combined testing, including Pap test, HPV DNA test and cervicography, as screening methods for the detection of uterine cervical cancer.
Cervical cancer is a serious disease that threatens the health of women worldwide. This study compared the sensitivities and false-positive rates of cervical cytology (Pap smear), human papilloma virus (HPV) DNA test, cervicography, first double-combined testing (cervical cytology and HPV DNA test), second double-combined testing (cervical cytology and cervicography) and triple-combined testing...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005